Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crocodillos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crocodillos

Crocodillos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Popular restaurant in Santa Ponsa, Spain. No significant and independent coverage. Wronkiew (talk) 08:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. The only reliable source I found is this one: [1] (the restaurant is also mentioned on the guide's introductory page for Mallorcan dining, emphasising that they consider it important: [2]), but that is not enough to establish notability. If other sources turn up, consider this a keep. JulesH (talk) 10:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete (for now). I am in the same position as JulesH. Perhaps someone who speaks Dutch could help see if there are any sources to be had in that language, since the owners are Dutch. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  08:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - While
  WP:RS is somewhat vague on where the line is drawn on what a reliable source is, I believe the Travel Channel to be a reliable source. TC is notable and a third party. While it may be considered weak, it has obtained notoriety from a reliable source. In my opinion, it should be kept. OlYeller^Talktome 12:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I agree the Travel Channel is a reliable source, but JulesH's source is a destination guide. If TC had featured the restaurant on one of its segments or otherwise reported on it, I'd call it a keeper. But this is just a destination guide and as such I don't think the bar for being included in the list of restaurants is very high-- on the contrary, I think destination guides try to be have more inclusive listings of restaurants. Perhaps this can contribute towards notability, but by itself, I don't think it's enough to establish notability. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  17:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I should have actually checked the TC link. I'm changing my vote and noting a lesson learned. :-) OlYeller^Talktome 18:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.