Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberAlert, Inc.

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CyberAlert, Inc.

CyberAlert, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A rather thick slick of spam,not a genuinely encyclopedic article. I am not seeing this article meeting

WP:CORP requirements. And Adoil Descended (talk) 03:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 04:06, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 04:06, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Highbeam turns up a number of links but I'm not seeing anything beyond routine announcements, nor is the PR Toolkit quotation sufficient to demonstrate
    WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 13:21, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete based on
    WP:CORP, but further suggest that "all sources contain the abbreviation PR" be considered a CSD criterion. --j⚛e deckertalk 23:49, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.