Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Décarie Interchange

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Quebec Autoroute 40; if there's any content to be merged, it can be done from behind the redirect. Daniel (talk) 07:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Décarie Interchange

Décarie Interchange (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reasoning or sources provided to give any indication as to the importance of this interchange.

WP:HWY generally does not cover interchanges unless they garner very significant local or some non-local coverage. Floydian τ ¢ 08:23, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the ]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question Any chance that we could redirect it to one of the highway articles? Presumably there's some local coverage that we could use to add coverage to the highway article in question. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • We could, but which of the three (A-15, A-40 or Route 117) should it be put on? - Floydian τ ¢ 17:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • My guess, based on the name of the interchange, is A-40— which is also, based on the relevant articles, obviously the most important route at that interchange. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 18:39, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've cleaned up A-40 to fit the info, but I can't figure out a good way to word it so that it isn't undue weight. However, I am in support of a merge. - Floydian τ ¢ 03:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.