Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DOS.MASTER (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Glen Bredon. Sandstein 23:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DOS.MASTER

AfDs for this article:

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software product. Substantial third-party references are simply not found, so reliable sources can't be used to establish deletion. Previous AFD was a decade ago, closed with shaky reasoning about asserted notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeblas (talk • contribs) 17:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to somewhere, probably to the author
block device support, using that to run DOS 3.3 programs on bigger drives by making DOS 3.3 programs think that they had access a whole lot of floppy disks, which is all DOS 3.3 was smart enough to understand.) As for the few publicly-searchable web sources: The files for DOS.Master are at http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/a2zine/System/ but it's not covered in the a2zine articles themselves, as far as I know. There is a brief attempt at independent investigation of DOS Master at http://dreher.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=89 but it turns out not to have gone very far. --Closeapple (talk) 05:58, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The ability to continue to be able to execute programs written for a previous OS on its abandonment, is known as backward compatibility. Such is very important & significant, and is what DOS.MASTER offered. In that era (late 1980's), backward compatibility was a real and huge concern in the realm of OSs. I was not personally involved in anything Apple related (I was, and still am, a "child" of Microsoft), so I don't feel confident about me personally evaluating the article's claim of DOS.Master having "experienced widespread success", but if the claim is even just somewhat true, then I have no doubt that DOS.MASTER is fully deserving of having a Wikipedia article.
--DexterPointy (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note. Wikipedia's

notability guidelines make no mention of backward compatibility. -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment to Note: Wikipedia's

notability guidelines also makes no mention of neither wheels nor tyres, both of which I perceive as being important & significant (though so in scope of vehicles, not OSs).
-- DexterPointy (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Merge to
talk) 20:59, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge to Glen Bredon. There might be coverage to establish notability, but I suspect much of it is not available online. Alas, my own pile of Apple ][ magazines were tossed 15 years ago. -- Whpq (talk) 20:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.