Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXFK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 02:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DXFK

DXFK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references found to indicate this station passes

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or redirect to
  WP:BROADCAST. Yappy2bhere (talk) 03:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: The station is licensed by the NTC as it indicates an operator having a station. It was initially issued a PA per 2019 NTC Listing. It was only last year's listing when it was given a callsign. That said, the article is good enough to pass
  WP:BCAST. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Meets
  WP:BCAST per Astig's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 03:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per
  WP:BCAST. jp×g 04:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per
  WP:BCAST, plus this can be expanded in the future anyway --K. Peake 08:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.