Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daedalus Publishing (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daedalus Publishing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable publisher--and really part of a walled garden. Drmies (talk) 01:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 02:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 02:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 02:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 02:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete -- I could not locate any sources either in books or news. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.