Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan-O

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dan-O

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:BIO. Most statements in article are sourced to the author's website, another to an article that mentions him, and another to IMDB. Searching only turns up results for "Dan O Seasoning" and the General Hospital writer, Dan O'Connor. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 20:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Uncertain. While it once seemed that this guy (and especially his unusual business model) might be going somewhere, he does seem to have faded away. However, he seems no less notable than, say, the Hollywood Freeway chickens or Ayalahi, to name two. Minturn (talk) 20:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 20:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Connecticut, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as one reliable source does not an article make. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Subject does not meet the
WP:SIGCOV. Of the current sources, the first is from the website of the company owned by the subject, the second is independent but lacks depth at only a couple of short sentences, and the third is a database. A BEFORE check doesn't come up with much else. Let'srun (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: No SIGCOV and GNG. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.