Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Levenson (musician)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Desertarun (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)]
Dan Levenson (musician)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dan Levenson (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that he meets
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A book was written about him, and he has written
a bookbooks about banjo playing. I have started adding references, but I need to take a break now. StonyBrook babble 22:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC) - Keep per WP:ARTIST #1 (cited by peers as an authority in his field) #2 (renowned for implementing popular field workshops for beginners all around the world) and #3 (large body of highly acclaimed instruction books). StonyBrook babble 12:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun (talk) 15:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP I think being the subject of a third-party book should qualify as notable. True, McFarland are niche publishers, but it is nonetheless third-party coverage. ShelbyMarion (talk)
- keep with new sources added by @WP:ARTIST#1. Agree the Stern and Brooks book should weigh heavily.
- keep with new sources added by @
- Oblivy (talk) 01:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.