Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dangmattsmith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dangmattsmith

Dangmattsmith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage to demonstrate this passes

Note: This discussion has been included in the

^Talk∕_Contribs 09:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

^Talk∕_Contribs 09:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete as per nom, no reliable sources or coverage of career. Fails
  WP:ENT. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 12:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete As per nom. Woinfosd (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable root vegatable, I mean youtuber. I could just not resist making that joke.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Barely found anything about him. Per
  WP:ARBITRARY, having millions of subs does not make him notable. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 10:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.