Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Comerford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Comerford

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only available coverage is this piece in the local paper which is of the "local 22-year old very successful" sort. The business itself has not been discussed in other sources. Not sufficient for

WP:GNG. – Thjarkur (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Best of luck to the chap, and all that, but just not notable (not yet, at least). One article in the local rag (typically with very low news threshold) does not constitute sigcov. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable businessman. scope_creep^Talk 19:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.