Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darla Baker

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Darla Baker

Darla Baker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My PROD was removed Valfontis as this had actually been PRODed before here by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz and speaking of the history, you'll notice this article has had quite a noticeable one with both the subject (??) removing and questioning its accuracy as well as vandalism (see talk page as well). I note I still confirm and echo my PROD: Seemingly questionably notable and improvable biography as my searches only found a few passing mentions at News and browsers, hardly much to improve sourcing, notability and improvement overall here. 2009 history also suggests the subject questions the accuracy of this article as well (is that was her?? Things here aren't certain one side or another at all) and there has also been other BLP vandalism and troubles so this also contributes to this simply being best deleted for now.". SwisterTwister talk 19:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 01:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The references are clearly inadequate-- the New York one is not even an article, but a directory entry. DGG ( talk ) 06:42, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 18:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per
    talk) 17:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.