Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Oved

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arguing to keep based on sources that may come into existence in the future is weak. If such sources are written, the article can always be recreated. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:15, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Oved

Darren Oved (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lawyer, fails WP:GNG; WP:NORG, WP:NOTCV. Routine coverage of cases, article is very much a CV and there is no notability in sources or elsewhere. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, Business, and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If Mr. Oved had a wikipedia page before the Hans Niemann lawsuit, then probably it should be KEEP just on the basis that it's a weak page but not offensively so.
    If this page was created in anticipation or in the shadow of the Niemann lawsuit (this is a world-wide news story arising from the world of professional chess), then DELETE. The person does not appear to be of any significance, and should not be using Wikipedia in such an opportunistic manner. Jdxcrow (talk) 22:37, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete "lawyer to the stars" isn't a reason to have an article, most are name drops or just cases he's worked on. I'd expect a lawyer to win cases, nothing terribly notable about any of them. Oaktree b (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep Various
    WP:NBIO. Check his list of highly notable clients: Cat Cora, Alex Sapir (the son of Tamir Sapir), Tiësto and Rebecca Minkoff, Zinedine Zidane, Christian Vieri, Paolo Maldini, and Andriy Shevchenko, and they are not quite non-notable cases that were not won. Clearly a notable attorney who has enough notability for Wikipedia. Snowseven (talk) 21:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment having clients is what lawyers do. We need to see why these cases are notable or he's just another joe doing his job. Oaktree b (talk) 22:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - first, substantively, he's just not notable as a lawyer; see
    contributed to this mess. Bearian (talk) 19:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.