Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Avraham Spektor
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep per
WP:SK#1. The nominator withdrew their nomination, and no other !votes (other than the nomination) to delete were posted. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 21:03, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
David Avraham Spektor
Unsourced BLP for five years, unable to find reliable secondary sources which meet the requirements of WP:GNG. Language issues may be in play, additional sources welcomed, as always. j⚛e deckertalk 18:45, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. 19:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. 19:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. 19:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Spelling may be an issue with search. Finding some hits with " David Avraham Spector ", which seem to back the position of head of the Department of Eruvin and Mikvaot, Rabbanut Beit Shemesh ( http://www.connectionsmag.co.il/articlenav.php?id=345 )Not sure this proves notability, but the article could probably be cited to make a case for it. Celtechm (talk) 19:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw, I'm seeing enough here that, while I can't prove it yet, I've been able to add some sources and I smell a high probability that notability can be demonstrated. --j⚛e deckertalk 20:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.