Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of An Indie Label: Soundtrack
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. v/r - TP 01:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Death of An Indie Label: Soundtrack
Disputed PROD. Original reason given for proposed deletion: Content-less listing of a soundtrack for a movie whose article does not exist. Singularity42 (talk) 21:25, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Given WTF's move and substantial change of the article (see below), I have changed my rational for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A bare track listing; this could be speedied. Neutralitytalk 20:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Esham is a notable artist and this was covered by Metro Times. WTF (talk) 15:24, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
User:Wisdomtenacityfocus has moved the article to Death of an Indie Label. Singularity42 (talk) 18:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Given WTF's re-naming of the article, my original deletion rational no longer applies (as WTF has changed the article from an article about the movie's soundtrack to an article about the movie itself.) As an aside, WTF, when an article is being discussed at AfD, it is probably best to raise such a substantial change before actually doing it. This new version of the article fails reliable sources. The movie is not notable yet. Singularity42 (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails ]
- Keep. Esham is a notable artist, and his albums and documentaries are therefore notable. This is going to be covered by many reliable sources, and although whoever added it probably should have waited to make the article, it makes little sense to delete an article that's just going to be re-created in a matter of weeks. It's already been covered by Metro Times, though, so there is at least one reliable source other than those related to the subject. Luvanger666 (talk) 06:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.