Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dedication 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 03:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dedication 3

Dedication 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

• Delete, while it is referenced from a reliable source, the mention is a little trivial in my view. Fails notability per
  WP:JANNMT Keep for the Pitchfork & NYT ref's.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 22:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I added a brief review in the NYT to help with notability. Although most are non-notable, mixtapes are one of the things these guys are known for. Flowanda | Talk 22:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The mixtapes have been a huge part of the Lil Wayne story. Currently this article contains links to MTV mentions and a NYT review that is much more meaty than I presumed from Flowanda's comment above. I have no doubt that more good sources exist and will exist. Notable. 86.44.24.31 (talk) 02:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here's the Pitchfork review, for instance. 86.44.24.31 (talk) 02:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.