Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defiant Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 23:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Defiant Championship

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable entertainment event with no independent

WP:N. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Weak keep This does have independent
WP:RS from cagematch.net Archived 2012-07-03 at archive.today. It also meets the criteria on WP:NEVENT. —Formal Dude^(talk) 00:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Cagematch is not significant independent coverage. It is a wrestling database with no criteria for inclusion. It can be used to source an article, but not to prove its notability. Nikki♥311 03:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you've convinced me more. But it does seem like it would could be

WP:LASTING because it creates events and champions. It is on an international stage as well. —Formal Dude^(talk) 12:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

The promotion itself is struggling to prove notability, and failed a AfD of its own. The championship, doesn't meet GNG due to lack of reliable secondary sources. Cagematch is a database, and can only be used to prove match results, and not notability. It's also quite clearly been made despite being asked not to on the main page. Lee Vilenski(talk) 14:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Page is a violation of Talk:Defiant Wrestling#Stubbed guidelines which were spelled out after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defiant Wrestling resulted in stubify. - Galatz ^Talk 00:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to a redirect with full protection until notoriety can be proven Lee Vilenski(talk) 12:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Identical content was originally at trial on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defiant Wrestling; the parent article got stubbed for notability troubles. Cagematch includes data on everything wrestling related and cannot prove notability.LM2000 (talk) 05:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per nom. Cheers,
talk) 22:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.