Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delores Robinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Delores Robinson

Delores Robinson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:18, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Robinson was elected as a fellow of the Geological Society of America, she therefore meets criterion 3 of WP:PROF. Richard Nevell (talk) 20:39, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. In addition to the pass of #C3 noted above, her citation record [1] looks good enough to me for a pass of
  WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per C3, although since I'd already gone through the trouble of assessing her and her coauthors' Scopus metrics before refreshing this page I'll include them (if not for C3 she would have been a weak C1 delete from me). These are for her 40 coauthors with >9 papers:

Total citations: avg: 7304, med: 5041, Robinson: 2252.

Total papers: avg: 107, med: 100, R: 36.

h-index: avg: 37, med: 35, R: 20.

Top 5 papers: 1st: avg: 711, med: 438, R: 433. 2nd: avg: 482, med: 389, R: 404. 3rd: avg: 354, med: 292, R: 237. 4th: avg: 280, med: 220, R: 220. 5th: avg: 237, med: 193, R: 216.

Top first-author: avg: 478, med: 269, R: 220. JoelleJay (talk) 22:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Fellow status is enough to meet
  WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:43, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep FGSA meets criterion 3 of
  WP:NPROF. Edwardx (talk) 11:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - As a full prof. in a specialized field of geology with an h-index of 20 I think she meets
  WP:NPROF criteria #1, and with the status as an elected fellow of the Geological Society of America she meets NPROF #3, therefore the article should be retained. Netherzone (talk) 21:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Department chair and fellow of GSA more then enough for
  WP:NPROF. --Dystopos (talk) 13:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Nomination withdrawn seems like there is a general consensus on the notability, which is even more clear after the recent edits. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.