Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demos from the Basement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Used (album). MBisanz ^talk 21:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Demos from the Basement

Demos from the Basement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log

)

• Delete - no reliable source to establish notability or existence of this very limitedly released album.--Boffob (talk) 18:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge - how about a merge of the tracklist into the article for The Used (album). It seems most of the songs were re-recorded for this album, so mentioning the demo here may be more appropriate than a separate article. Nouse4aname (talk) 12:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not notable per WP criteria. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable per the music notability guidelines, and seems overly promotional.
  talk • contribs) 20:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to The Used, because it's a term that's likely to be searched. The info in this article can be placed in the "Early years" section, which needs to be expanded more. Some info, like the tracklisting, could be put into The Used (album), which would provide more of a background on the subject. I'm willing to do the work of merging all the info into these articles. If notability is established in the future, the article could easily be re-created with the edit history intact. --Pwnage8 (talk) 10:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Re-direct, as suggested above--Cassius 52 (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.