Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharsha Gupta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If new sources become available, a draft can be initiated in draftspace and submitted for approval through the

WP:AFC process. BD2412 T 00:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Dharsha Gupta

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject clearly fails

WP:NACTOR. It is a promotional article as the subject participated in the recently aired reality show Cooku with Comali. The page has lot of edits from an IP involved in recent socky puppetry investigation Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Romil.Choudary/Archive. 2600:6C58:4B7F:6084:1994:1790:4070:5EB8 (talk) 22:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)}}[reply

]

Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor--above text is copied from article talk page. No opinion at this time on the article per se, but if the SPI accusation is accurate (and having worked on other IP-nominated AfDs for articles created by the master mentioned above, I find it credible), then the article is eligible for speedy deletion per
WP:G5. --Finngall ^talk 00:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy delete per
WP:G5 as creator’s sockpuppetry has been confirmed by CU. --Finngall ^talk 02:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 00:28, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 00:28, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 00:28, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes
~~WP:PUFFERY and I think the article is worded quite neutrally.SunDawn (talk) 01:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC)~~ Speedy delete per creator is blocked as a sock. Article should be rescued after speedily deleted. SunDawn (talk) 03:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

*Keep: Clearly passes

~~WP:NACTOR~~ no doubt. The upcoming film project she is being part of has declared her as the lead actress and the name of the film has been released. Even if its a sockpuppetry the user has gave a good piece of work and trustworthy sources.User: 49.196.6.191 talk: 49.196.6.191 00:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC) Striking blocked sock. --Finngall ^talk 03:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - sockpuppetry should never be encouraged. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as article created by sock and no indication of satisfying either
WP:GNG. VV 08:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: Delete per nom. Fails NACTOR. Kolma8 (talk) 17:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. That the article's creator has been confirmed by CU is sufficient alone to justify speedy deletion, as well as normal deletion under
WP:AFD Johnnie Bob (talk) 22:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: Fails NACTOR Ravensfire (talk) 20:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.