Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Cardinal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Cardinal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found nothing to show he meets any notability criteria. The only coverage I could find were one line mentions or his name in a list of names and that's not the significant independent coverage required to meet

WP:MANOTE. Mdtemp (talk) 17:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 18:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not sure what the notability standards are for carnival/side-show wrestlers, but there's no record of him competing in actual sporting events that would show notability. The sources are one line mentions or his name in a list of fellow carnival wrestlers which I don't think is enough to meet
WP:GNG. There's also nothing independent to show he's a notable wrestling coach.204.126.132.231 (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I don't see the sourcing required to meet
WP:NOTINHERITED. Papaursa (talk) 20:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.