Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Oliver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No new input to resolve the divisions from before the last relist, and it's not clear whether the nominator (who seems to have attempted to vanish before being indeffed) still supports deletion. RL0919 (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Oliver

Dick Oliver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Single reference -BigDwiki ^talk 04:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment 3 more sources, I'm not saying they're enough: [1][2][3] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One more: [4] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per
  WP:JOURNALIST. He was the editor of the New York Daily News, but apparently didn't distinguish himself. The New York Times obituary I'm going to dismiss as local coverage, as no other paper published one AFAIK. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:55, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 03:55, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
  Talk to my owner:Online 20:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. Additional sources were found by G.G.S. above, refuting the basis for this nomination. Also it appears the nominator attempted to withdraw this (before being banned 14 minutes later). ―cobaltcigs 18:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - if the sources that have been found were added to the article, per
  WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete a local obituary from the same industry does not show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.