Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diddy Kong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to List of Donkey Kong characters. Owen× ☎ 19:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diddy Kong

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason - Just because the character have join

WP:SIGCOV and some of the references such as Database websites, eStarland and gallery and image are unreliable. the only exception is the reception section which looks okay but still, it has unreliable sources so. NatwonTSG2 (talk) 14:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner:Online 14:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Donkey Kong characters, he is not independently notable of the games where he appears. There's a serious lack of significant coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. To be honest I was thinking about this one myself, the sourcing for a lot of the Smash Bros. character articles is sadly in the same state across the board.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Not enough SIGCOV here. Ping me if more is found. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. Generalissima (talk) 17:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. Been looking at this one for a while, and the coverage just isn't there. Willing to reconsider if more sources are found. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. The broader scope gives needed context.
Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 04:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep or merge with his section at
WP:PRESERVE. --Rtkat3 (talk) 19:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge as
WP:CONSENSUS. I'd like to imagine there are more sources for this, but there is nothing significant to say that is separate from the series. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge because the relevance of the character is based solely on the video games and does not exist for the character as a standalone. Killarnee (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.