Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Didi Priyadi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — The Earwig ^talk 03:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Didi Priyadi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject doesn't seem to meet

WP:GNG. A couple of guest appearances for a notable band, but other than that no notable work. The given references are either dead links or self-published primary sources. No charting albums or non-trivial coverage. Mikeblas (talk) 15:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment as creator. I created this article back when I was a new editor and still learning about content guidelines. I don't know if it is notable or not. Priyadi very well could be notable in Indonesia, but I have no idea how to demonstrate that for this English wiki. I anticipated for years that this article would be nominated for deletion.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 16:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment: I did find some sources in Bahasa Indonesia that verify that Pentagressive is notable (this, this, and possibly this. However, I'm not sure if that notability transfers to Priyadi.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 16:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a
insulting to read. Bearian (talk) 21:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.