Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Access Signalling System 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ and no merger possible since the target does not exist. Star Mississippi 16:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Access Signalling System 1

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article closely paraphrases part of a section about it on this website. Other than that, there's nothing more than mentions of this signalling system. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 02:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are quite a few books available online describing DASS1, other offline sources likely exist:

https://archive.org/details/bte-198407/page/n17/mode/2up?q=%22DASS+Signalling%22

https://archive.org/details/bte-198501/page/n27/mode/2up?q=%22Digital+Access+Signalling+System%22

https://archive.org/details/telecommunicatio0000farr/page/76/mode/2up?q=%22Digital+Access+Signalling+System%22

https://archive.org/details/communicationsys0000brew/page/128/mode/2up?q=%22Digital+Access+Signalling+System%22

Based on the coverage in these sources, it seems that a discretionary merger of DASS1 and closely related articles such as Digital Access Signalling System 2 into a single article about the history of ISDN in the UK may make sense if somebody decides to write such article in the future. PaulT2022 (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, merging sounds like a good idea. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 00:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.