Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital webber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Digital webber

Digital webber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable firm. Fails

• Delete Per
  WP:PROMO Insignficant coverage in reliable 3rd party sources. Comatmebro (talk) 20:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Two year old, 50 employee generic company with nothing special or encyclopedic about it? Andy Dingley (talk) 22:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nothing notable about a digital agency, which establishment and growth are similar to many other digital agencies. robertsky (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - seems to be a non-notable company that fails
  WP:NOTADVERTISING, as the article creator was able to furnish authentic images of the inside of this company's offices.--SamHolt6 (talk) 02:10, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - I concur - Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails NCORP. -
  KH-1 (talk) 03:03, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - fails NCORP, is PROMOtional, looks like a part of a promotional campaign for West Bengal.Jacona (talk) 11:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails
  WP:NCORP. Also, being that it was created with lowercase name suggests it may have been deleted previously and the creator is attempting to avoid it being noticed. An admin should consider if salting its creation is appropriate. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

There's nothing at Digital Webber to support that. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:44, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Fails
  WP:NCORP. This looks like it has been created by a paid editor. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.