Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dina Ellis Rochkind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:58, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dina Ellis Rochkind

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on financial lobbyist with a promotional tone. Nearly all the references are either from her employer's website, trade publications or hiring blurbs from the financial industry, or wire articles on cryptocurrency where interview quotes from her are used briefly. I did searches of reliable, independent sources and found no coverage of her. William Graham ^talk 04:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Cryptocurrency, and Finance. William Graham ^talk 04:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Washington, D.C.. • Gene93k (talk) 08:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.
WP:GNG. NYC Guru (talk) 10:28, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete article does have a promotional tone and most refs mention her in passing and are not about her. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.