Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dina Jewel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:07, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dina Jewel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails pornbio and gng. The politiken link is a whats on kind of directory. Vg is a tabloid and not rs

Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per nom. Unclear why the redirect was reversed. Legacypac (talk) 20:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:35, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and restore redirect per the above. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:24, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Concur with nominator. Finnegas (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - she passes the
general notability guidelines having been extensively covered by Danish and Norwegian newspapers Politiken [1], Verdens Gang (VG)[2], and AOK[3]. Dismissing VG because of its tabloid size format is inappropriate given that it is probably the most popular newspaper in Norway. Dismissing the politiken article because it's about her club opening is also inappropriate. It is not merely a "what's on" listing. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

the sun and the daily mail are the two most popular papers in the uk so thats a silly argument and its a tabloid still. Aok is a listing mag and its an interview which means its not an rs, ymmv but seriously? Gossip papers and primary sources as rs for a blp?

Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

So you can't present any evidence on Politiken (a broadsheet) and VG's reputation beyond format size. Got it. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:34, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

tabloid clearly means the style of paper not size. If I accepted politiken its only 1 of the necessary 2 sources, don't be a tool.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Again you have not presented any evidence on its reputation beyond declaring it to be a tabloid. Here are other articles from the

Copenhagen Post [5] Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- the coverage above is either trivial or tabloid like, such as about participating in a stunt involving "body shots". Something like this does not make an individual wiki notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.