Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirk Imhof

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn; multiple in-depth reviews of work exist. (non-admin closure) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:30, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dirk Imhof

Dirk Imhof (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication for suffcient notability as an academic; sources are the flimsiest of incidental mentions (and I must say that I've never seen the same wedding notice used as three references before...) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:36, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
talk) 20:25, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
I agree that does look like a critical mass. Suggest I'll wait another day or so, then may withdraw. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
thankyou David Eppstein, btw, editors are always welcome to grab info i include on afds and add them to articles:))Coolabahapple (talk) 08:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.