Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disposable photography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 22:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disposable photography

Article does give reader any reason to believe that "Disposable photography" is anything more than a phrase/concept invented by a relatively unknown photographer. There is nothing to indicate that the phrase is commonly used in the manner described. Fourohfour 17:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional: Google search on "Laura LeSire" and "Disposable photography" turns up *nothing* except copies/derivatives of the Wikipedia article itself. Fourohfour 17:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable neologism describing non-notable technique. If the article had been titled "using a disposable camera", which has the same meaning, it would not have got even this far.--
Anthony.bradbury 17:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, non-notable --Bill.matthews 02:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If there were a real movement with this name it might be interesting. Google suggests there is no such movement, and Wikipedia should not be spearheading either a movement or a neologism. EdJohnston 20:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above...
Addhoc 13:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.