Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ditch, (magazine)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep, likely bad-faith nomination (for more detail, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ailsa Land) with no non-sockpuppet delete opinions. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Ditch, (magazine)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails
WP:NORG. 4 sources not reliable, 1st and 2nd collected from blog, other two references does not meet criteria. Riazul Islam BD (talk) 14:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)— Riazul Islam BD (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the - talk 14:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the - talk 14:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)]
- Keep - easily passes Transgressive poetry and other notable sub-genres by poets from Canada, USA, Europe, Bangladesh, Iceland and other places. It is a significant experimental poetry magazine. (note: I am the article creator) - Epinoia (talk) 00:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)]
- — Note to closing admin: XfD.
Delete for now clearly failed to proved any significant coverage of this magazine in reliable sources. It does not even get close to fill up WP:WEBCRIT). — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 06:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)striking !vote from blocked sock of nominator. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)]
- Keep per Epinoia, notability seems clear enough, and while the article would benefit from more inline citations (so that every claim is visibly supported), there is plenty of evidence in its favour. Since the nominator has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry, this AfD should be closed speedily. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:34, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.