Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixie D'Amelio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Dixie D'Amelio

Dixie D'Amelio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability not independent of her sister Dosafrog (talk) 22:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Variety and Fox Business articles are about her, and only have passing mention of her sister. Seventeen article leads off with the fact that she is Charli's sister, but it focuses on her. Just as almost any article about Emma Roberts comments that she is Julia Roberts's niece, that doesn't mean Emma is not notable on her own. Same applies here, as she is one of the top 10 followed TikTok accounts (1 rung higher than Will Smith. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:48, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Checking the sources, the subject seems notable/independent to me. - SUBWAY 23:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notability totally independent from her sister: A song that is number one in the charts, a main role in a series. And I don't mention the significant coverage in medias like Fox Biz or Variety. Clearly meets
  WP:GNG. --Deansfa (talk) 00:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Seems notable, from a quick search. Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Donaldd23, definitely clears
  WP:GNG. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 00:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. Probably a snow keep here. Dixie is one of the most well-known
  WP:GNG. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 00:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 00:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 00:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep. Nominator clearly does not understand that this subject has massive significant coverage for many activities independent of her sister and therefore clearly meets
  WP:SNOW keep. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 01:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep I just declined a PROD by the same editor, claiming the subject is not notable. The subject clearly meets
  WP:ENTERTAINER. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Notability is not inherited, but there is also no rule saying only one sister in a family can be notable. She meets coverage herself as per the above votes. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Very notability TikTok personality, thanks to her sister but known independently as well. Also, her single "Be Happy" is a global hit and it cannot be ignored.
  talk) 20:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep, Per above, has enough coverage to meet
  WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 09:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.