Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Let It Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to I Robot (album). — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 19:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Let It Show

)

No content, sources, or notability for an article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails notability per
WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge and Redirect to I Robot (album). Useful information could be lost if simply deleted. --JD554 (talk) 10:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge. The song has been covered by another artist.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 01:55, 30 April 2009
- WP:NSONGS suggests that a song needs to be covered by several notable artists, this has just one mentioned. --JD554 (talk) 09:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

redirect to I Robot (album). after redirecting merge option is available to anyone who thinks there is sourced info worth merging. Duffbeerforme (talk) 12:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into
talk) 14:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC))[reply
]

Merge and redirect. A lack of notability for a separate article, is insufficient reason to ignore the possibility to redirect the name or merge information in favor of deleting the entire thing along with a possibly useful redirect. Nominator shows no evidence of having done the research required by
WP:BEFORE. The sources show the information is worth keeping in some form and if another artist also covers it, it's even notable enough to be spun out again. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the
² 16:15, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.