Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Harris (Ex-Councilor)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 00:26, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Don Harris (Ex-Councilor)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Don Harris (Ex-Councilor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
WP:NPOLITICIAN FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN Just being an elected local councillor does not guarantee notability. Theroadislong (talk) 21:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete Does not meet talk) 21:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete Member of the Albuquerque City Council. Fails ]
- Delete City council members are not default notable and the coverage is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails storm28 01:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)]
- Keep I am getting your view point that he is a local politician and may have less coverage. However, he had worked on that seat straight 20 years and brought changes in environmental department and even worked for animal rights. All the work is for that particular region, but people of that region may have the right to get information about the local politician from Wikipedia. I just have the opinion that he may not have national or international level notability but he is notable for the people of that state. So if he can be the first local politician on Wikipedia, there must be article place for regional politician also so that people can access it on Wikipedia. Sumneeb (talk) 12:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @WP:ILIKEIT is not a valid argument for a deletion discussion. This politician is simply not suitable for inclusion. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 13:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)]
- @Timtrent I am not saying that I want this article because I like it. I am just giving my opinion that he is a notable regional politician. Sumneeb (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Sumneeb I'm afraid that opinions that are not based on policy which seek to keep an article are alwasy seen as ILIKEIT. If you have a policy based rationale for retention now is the time to place that here. Please do so. Your voice is important to the community in building consensus. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 13:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Timtrent I am not saying that I want this article because I like it. I am just giving my opinion that he is a notable regional politician. Sumneeb (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @
- Keep WP:LAW He has played prominent role in formulation of Bankruptcy Law. http://fbaum.unc.edu/lobby/046_Bankruptcy_Reform/Congressional_Hearings/Testimony/H_Judiciary_4_031899.htm
He also made prominent participation in New Mexico Family Law. Sumneeb (talk) 13:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to SPEAK 20:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete Fails the notability guidelines, more sources to be added.Timetraveller80 (talk) 11:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.