Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Black (author)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:29, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Donald Black (author)
- Donald Black (author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously PROD deleted, but recently undeleted via REFUND. Same reason as in the PROD. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The-Pope (talk) 02:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It'd be lovely if we could keep every struggling author, but Black simply doesn't pass notability guidelines per talk) 03:27, 17 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Delete without prejudice, per "up-and-coming", but for those already notable. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, although like the others above I agree that he could become notable enough eventually. Just not yet. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless reliable sources are added. I'm a bit confused by the WP:TOOSOON comments. He's 77 years old and his last book was published 16 years ago. Anything's possible, but if there's not substantial coverage by now it's unlikely there will be more later. Pburka (talk) 02:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.