Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Simrock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Simrock

Donald Simrock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found nothing to suggest better sourcing and notability, with the best results here and here. SwisterTwister talk 03:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I see no evidence of notability -- perhaps there is, for this is a specialized profession, but it's also one where most sources are less than ideally reliable for notability . DGG ( talk ) 18:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: you would have to be an outstanding makeup artist to truly be notable in the field. He isn't, apparently. Quis separabit? 17:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.