Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donte Moncrief

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Donte Moncrief (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable via

Keep Clearly passes GNG:[1][2][3][4][5] along with the sources on the article. You might want to do a little more research before these noms.--Yankees10 18:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Yankees10,

HOWDY! 19:07, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep per Yankees10's sources. –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per
  WP:GNG. --Arxiloxos (talk) 02:36, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep All of the nominations by this particular nominator appear to be based on a misunderstanding of how
  WP:GNG trumps all other WikiProject-specific notability guidelines. Ejgreen77 (talk) 21:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Doesn't meet NCOLLATH or NGRIDIRON. All the coverage is routine sports reporting about his attempt to make an NFL team. Every player drafted is not automatically notable and they all receive this kind of coverage. This is
  WP:ONEEVENT. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Article clearly meets
  WP:NGRIDIRON. Badgersox (talk) 10:57, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.