Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DooPHP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:34, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DooPHP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this software is notable. –

ebraminio^talk 07:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:33, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:33, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this software seems to enjoy the extensive coverage in PHP-focused blogs; this means that it enjoys the high level of awareness and still wasn't considered worth mention by reliable sources. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Yet another PHP framework. I cannot find the significant sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.