Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Boss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--

Dragon Boss

Dragon Boss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete as nom. Much like the article that spawned in,

• • If no one knows what this is supposed to be about, if nothing else we can commend the article for being highly accurate. </tongueincheek> - Chardish 07:44, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete: no content, no context, and
  Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Anytime the nomination reason is longer than the article, it's a very strong sign the article needs to go. - Chardish 01:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Articles like these make me happy that Wikipedia wasn't around when I was a kid. Natalie 03:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Josh Parris 04:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this actually has so little content, that is ventures into the realm of negative content. We can't even begin to ask whether or not it is notable, since it's not even clear what's going on. --Haemo 07:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - nobody cares. MER-C 08:44, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ← ANAS ^Talk? 08:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not have enough info for a wikipedia article.
  addict 17:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.