Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dremo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dremo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria. I strongly suspect the article creator,

conflict of interest

as he/she has primarily contributed promotional articles about Nigerian musical artists, including this article as well as:

Korrekt (musician) (already deleted)
Black Magic (musician) (deletion nomination)
DJ Kaywise (deletion nomination)

The fact that all these articles have professional-grade photos with a claim to self-authorship is also very strong evidence of undeclared COI. Citobun (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 21:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 21:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per reason on this AfD. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment editors should also be aware that the article creator has been temporarily blocked for a
talk) 11:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Mainly advertorial, cited sources are mostly videos. Fails WP:NMEDIA as sources lack sufficient depth. And the aforementioned WP:COI issues.ronaz ^Talk! 10:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Same here fail WP:MUSICBIO.--Historical Ben (talk) 14:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ia that a speedy delete G7? Blocked sock of creator, struck comment. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Spam from sock of blocked editor. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.