Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durfee Crossing, Arizona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Durfee Crossing, Arizona

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. No evidence that this is or was a notable populated place. (Split from previous batch AfD) –dlthewave ☎ 16:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 16:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 16:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Former creek crossing [1] and campsite, not a populated place. Reywas92^Talk 21:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Reywas92, not a populated place or otherwise notable. A former named crossing of Chevelon Creek. The creek article is another stub; theoretically it could be developed to include some info about this crossing/camp site if someone had the inclination and more sources. NN, not enough coverage for GNG/stand-alone article. MB 01:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Durfee Crossing, Arizona First nomination for deletion. Was a Speedy Keep, nomination withdrawn. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's

list of content for rescue consideration. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per Reywas92, this not a notable place. Lightburst (talk) 21:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if Merge is not an option. Do not see this as notable under what WP:GNG is meant for. PenulisHantu (talk) 18:05, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per
WP:SIGCOV. Ordinary geographic location. No evidence exists that it was ever inhabited. Not enough sources exist. Bearian (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.