Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dzigbordi Dosoo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Further discussion regarding the tone of the article can occur on the article's talk page, if desired. North America1000 19:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dzigbordi Dosoo

)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and lacks reliable third party sources Philafrenzy (talk) 06:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - has won an international award [1]. This, along with the sources
    WP:NBASIC
    .
  • Comment An "international award" means almost nothing. Awards and award ceremonies have proliferated in recent decades - see vanity award. Wikipedia does not have an article on these awards, or the awarding organisation. It is not a notable award. And that article is a promotional puff piece. Edwardx (talk) 14:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Even if one doesn't like the beauty business or this particular award, her show is seen in 46 countries in Africa, it's also shown in the UK, and in Europe. She is a beautiful, successful Black business woman who has achieved a lot. There's enough here to meet
WP:GNG. Jacona (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Most Delete opinions were before recent editing improvements. I'd like to relist just once more rather than closing this today as No Consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.