Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-learning/version 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –MuZemike 22:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

E-learning/version 3

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article does not indicate notability of specific subject "version 3" (though im sure thats an artifact transferred from a userpage). subject is covered by

Electronic learning, which is linked at the beginning. seems a rehash with no references. Mercurywoodrose (talk

) 07:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC) (PS this was created using Twinkle. if this was in any way done incorrectly, or if Twinkle is not considered appropriate for this function despite it being in the menu, i apologize, as this is my first use of the function.)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Uninformative definition: E-Learning or Electronic learning is the term used to describe all learning that has an electronic dimension to it. Likely
spam: Organisations such as SkillSoft, Epic, K Alliance, LearningSteps.com, BlueU and REDTRAY are leading innovators in the design and development of e-learning in the commercial world. Of these, SkillSoft are by far the largest and most experienced company in the global e-learning market, whilst Epic are the largest bespoke e-learning content providers. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - I can see nothing in this article that is missing from our
e-learning articel that is worth merging. As a redirect, this is an unlikely term so deletion is the best option. -- Whpq (talk) 19:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment I think this clarifies the origin of this (What is this section)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.