Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ECWF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train ^{take the} 19:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ECWF

Website with only 214 hits on its hit counter making it hardly notable. The author of the article removed my prod so it's up for AfD. oakster TALK 16:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per
WP:WEB. No evidence of notability. Walton monarchist89 17:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Each show, as mentioned in the talk page, gets in excess of 70 views. Not everyone may come to the index page, so the counter may not be a true indicator of the hits. Koberulz 17:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per
WP:WEB and lack of notability. Real indy feds don't stick around long here, so a fed created by editing bits of video game play around definitely doesn't seem to have notability. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

EWCF seems to have stuck around for a while, and I don't see how ECWF is any different.Koberulz 03:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tony wasn't talking about the longevitity of the website. He was talking about how long real indy feds last on Wikipedia before they get deleted. Searching ECWF on Google finds the website on page 6 on 981 results (with this article more nearer the top than that). The Dailymotion videos as you claim only get "in excess 70, at times well over 100 views". Articles based on notable webcast videos are usually at those on the hundred-thousands. The website or the videos are simply not that notable. -- oakster TALK 16:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neither was I. I was referring to the EWCF Wikipedia article. Koberulz 04:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Non-notable e-fed. RobJ1981 17:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.