Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easley High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Easley High School

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A quick search failed to turn up any good sources for the school apart from lists, etc. Perhaps creating a page for School District of Pickens County and merging into that page could cover this and the other schools in the district. Gusfriend (talk) 07:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Schools. Gusfriend (talk) 07:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:35, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is not even close to enough sourcing here to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think we should delete this school even though it's 113 years old and the original building is on the National Register of Historic Places? Jacona (talk) 20:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
JPL votes delete at every AfD he comes across, it could be the most notable thing in the whole wide universe and he'd still vote 'delete'. StickyWicket (talk) 21:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have written a note on their talk page inviting them to review their !delete vote. Jacona (talk) 01:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Easily enough sources available to satisfy
WP:GNG, as with any American high school. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Strong Keep I found this article on Newspapers.com after only a couple minutes. Many other newspapers covered this story. I haven't even checked for local or state coverage. [1] A Google search is rarely enough to find sources on High Schools.
talk) 22:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
They are mostly local newspapers. I just looked it up. Hemanth Nalluri 11 (talk) 03:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per
WP:BEFORE and my standards for high schools. There are, according to reliable sources, in grades 9 - 12, 1,710 students, and 86 teachers, at this public high school. There are almost assuredly notable alumni. Bearian (talk) 19:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The 1909 building is on the National Register of Historic Places [2]. For that matter, it's been around since at least 1909, or 113 years. There are now a bunch of sources in this article. I think there are 113 reasons to Keep. Jacona (talk) 20:20, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As proposer I would like to request that this AfD be closed with Keep and thank everyone for their improvements to the page. Gusfriend (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Johnpacklambert, in light of the nominator's request to withdraw, are you willing to strike your !k vote so that this nomination can be closed? Thanks! Jacona (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.