Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Point Software

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

East Point Software

East Point Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game development studio, fails the requirements for

WP:NCORP independent notability. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, fails

WP:NCORP. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and
    -- HighKing++ 13:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 04:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.