Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Ruggero
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is clear. But @TeriEmbrey: if you want this in draft, just let me know. Star Mississippi 03:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Please add it to draft. Most authors don't publish more than a few books. Ruggero has had published a lot of titles. TeriEmbrey (talk) 21:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Ed Ruggero
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ed Ruggero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find any significant coverage or reviews as per
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Military, United States of America, and Pennsylvania. Ploni (talk) 23:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No independent reliable sources with significant coverage. I'm surprised I didn't nominate the article for deletion when I patrolled it. Largoplazo (talk) 00:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Buckshot06 (talk) 01:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails ]
- Keep this is obviously a start article and needs to be expanded. Prolific authors should be included in Wikipedia and collectively we should move to improve instead of delete. TeriEmbrey (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- The deletion rationale isn't that the article is sparse, it's that he doesn't meet the notability criteria for inclusion. We aren't looking to have lots of details about relatively unknown people. Largoplazo (talk) 18:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)]
- The deletion rationale isn't that the article is sparse, it's that he doesn't meet the
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.