Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edge of the Earth
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to 30 Seconds to Mars (album). Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Edge of the Earth
- Edge of the Earth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
WP:MUSIC. Attempts to redirect to album article are reverted by various IP editors. AfD in attempt to gain consensus to delete then create a redirect (to prevent article recreation). Nouse4aname (talk) 15:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 16:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to WP:NSONGS. Doesn't appear to show any notability (charts, etc) other than actually being a single. kiac. (talk-contrib) 22:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to ]
- Keep A top 81 charting single in Japan.--Matthew Riva (talk) 12:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No source for charting, please provide ]
- Keep It is encyclopedic.--Loverdrive (talk) 16:06, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not a valid argument. Nouse4aname (talk) 12:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article contains no useful information. It does not even list who wrote the song. This article fails to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article and fails to satisfy the notability guidelines (WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC guidelines).--Yanq (talk) 07:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It peaked the #81 on the Japan Singles Chart.--ItHysteria (talk) 21:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Do we have a source for this charting? I cannot find it on Oricon and Billboard only lists the top 50. kiac. (talk-contrib) 13:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Again, source needed please... I can't find anything to back up these claims. Regardless of this, charting alone does not make a song notable. Coverage in reliable, third party sources is required for an article as per ]
- Redirect per nom, lacks coverage and fails ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.