Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Tipper

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Evaluating this AfD, there were many !votes for keep with a fuzzy understanding of how applicable policy may apply to the article given the sources and coverage. Both sides have arguments that are vague and don't necessarily refute the other side. Some participants expressed their views without a !vote, however their views also expressed interest in keeping but not necessarily for policy reasons. There was no consensus for redirect and based on the quality and content of the comments here, I am closing this as no consensus.

(non-admin closure) -- Dane talk 04:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Edward Tipper

Edward Tipper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Tipper Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Edward Tipper was an enlisted man in

notability. Information about Tipper did appear in both the Ambrose work and the mini-series based on it and in We Who Are Alive and Remain.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 00:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 00:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 00:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 00:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 00:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: @Smmurphy: kindly pointed out to me Tipper's obituary appeared in a number of newspapers nationwide; the obituary had been picked up by the Associated Press. I counted about twenty papers. The notices were basically similar and spoke of his brief time in the Army and his career as a teacher.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 00:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
To expand on the previous comment, Tipper's obituary was carried by the Associated Press and published in the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune (shortened), Philadelphia Inquirer, Baltimore Sun, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Indianapolis Star (shortened), South Florida Sentinel, and many more papers. The Denver Post obituary linked in the article is longer than most of these, which are about 11 paragraphs. You can find more at google books or newspapers.com. Outside of this and BoB-verse material, there is not much interest in him from the news. Thus the "Early life" and "Later life" sections of the article likely passes WP:V, WP:NOR, and WP:NPOV. Parts of the Military Service sections are only in the BoB-verse material, I don't know whether or not they are well documented enough to pass V, but they may be corroborated from records possibly available at Fold3 or elsewhere. The John Hay Fellowship was awarded to a large number (Brotherton says Tipper said about 30, but elsewhere the number in 1961 is said to be 76) of teachers (fourteen are listed here). Finally, the portrayal of Tipper in the miniseries is a significant part of a masters these (here). As that thesis has not, that I can find, been cited elsewhere, it may not be considered reliable per
WP:SCHOLARSHIP. As I don't think BoB-verse books are terribly reliable, I see this case largely as one of having a number of poor sources, a widely carried obituary, and a (or possibly more) routine mention. I don't have a !vote at this time. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:13, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spartaz Humbug! 11:49, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.