Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eigil Erbe

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eigil Erbe

Eigil Erbe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-term unsourced BLP, the link provided doesn't mention the fellow, Google can't find his name on that whole domain, NOWIKI is silent on him, most searches on his name focus on the lawyer of the same name rather than him, and I don't see what appears to be in-depth coverage. He might still be notable, but right now this appears to have been written by someone with the same last name, in a modestly promotional manner (tagged since November 2010). Additional sources welcomed, as always. I would suggest a redirect to Nidar but his name doesn't appear there. j⚛e deckertalk 03:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 09:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 09:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 09:42, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unless someone can find old newspaper sources in Norwegian; pre-2000 there's not a lot online, but there could be a lot of dead tree coverage. He has a page on a nice local history wiki here, showing that he became Chairman of the Board at
    notability on grounds of coverage either. By the way the article author, who has not edited since but said at the time that he could add Norwegian sources, stated on the talk page that he is the subject's grandson. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.