Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Polimata

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

El Polimata

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

El Polimata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After observing it flagged for notability concerns I performed a before search which shows this musician lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of him to warrant a standalone at the moment. Furthermore this article is borderline G11 eligible. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep My opinion on this article I was looking for information based on this article, which comes from a Dominican singer. I got into their social networks and some databases. I am opposed to its removal. since it will be a living person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elmenormcrd (talk • contribs)
  • Delete. The same article (albeit not posted this time from an account with the artist's name) that's already earned two A7 speedy deletions and still merits that but, since they keep trying and this discussion has been launched, let's finish this up, salt the article, and make it final. Not notable. Largoplazo (talk) 20:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Couldn't sources on Google that indicated notability. Erick (talk) 20:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Does not satisfy
    musical notability criteria. Previous deletions do not count. This article should be assessed on its merits (or lack of merits). Robert McClenon (talk) 18:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Comment — @Elmenormcrd, thanks but you aren’t permitted to !vote twice. Could you be so kind as to strike one out? Celestina007 (talk) 09:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment — IP above has three edits with its first edit being straight to the article nominated for deletion and the third being this !vote. Celestina007 (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep apparently it is an element of trust. the person contains relevant articles, contains criteria of musical notoriety. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.166.255.199 (talk) 03:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment— IP above has its first and only edit being a keep !vote to this AFD. Celestina007 (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Follow-up comment After !voting "delete" above, I noticed a large number of source being added to the article. I just reviewed a number of them and discovered that eight or nine of them are really three articles reprinted in multiple locations, one of them in four or five places. As most of the appearances of these have the by-line "Admin" or "The Editors", it gives the impression of being PR material that was passed around. So I've chosen not to change my !vote above. Largoplazo (talk) 04:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Largoplazo, thanks for the pertinent observations in the article. You’d also notice that this AFD itself has some rather bizarre activities by IPs. Celestina007 (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/El_Polimata&oldid=993716444"